Unofficial summary in English. The judgment is published in Portuguese only, and only the Portuguese text is authentic.
The appellants sought harmonisation of case law, alleging a conflict between Judgment No. 928/2024 and Judgment No. 963/2025 on whether precarious occupation of property founds a right of pre-emption in the grant of surface rights. The Court dismissed the appeal for lack of conflicting judgments, since the two judgments had been given in different procedural contexts, on different legal grounds, without identity of the fundamental question of law.
Decision
Appeal for harmonisation of case law dismissed
Type of proceedings
Appeal for harmonisation of case law (Recurso de Uniformização de Jurisprudência)
Full text
The judgment is published in Portuguese only, and only the Portuguese text is authentic. Read the judgment in Portuguese or download the official PDF.